We show theoretically and empirically that executives are paid less for their own firm’s performance and more for their rivals’ performance if an industry’s firms are more commonly owned by the same set of investors. Higher common ownership also leads to higher unconditional total pay. We exploit quasi-exogenous variation in common ownership from a mutual fund trading scandal to support a causal interpretation. These findings challenge conventional assumptions in the corporate finance literature about the objective function of the firm.
Authors:
Miguel Anton (IESE Business School), Florian Ederer (Yale School of Management), Mireia Gine (IESE Business School), Martin Schmalz (University of Michigan, Ross School of Business)
Discussant:
Sandy Klasa (University of Arizona)